yggdrasil/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* gdb.ada/arrayidx.exp: Remove calls to setup_kfail now that

Browse Source 
the corresponding bug has been fixed in GDB (PR/2018).
This commit is contained in:
Joel Brobecker 2006-10-06 20:48:42 +00:00
parent 714e295ef0
commit 390a1bd069
2 changed files with 5 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2006-10-06 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* gdb.ada/arrayidx.exp: Remove calls to setup_kfail now that
the corresponding bug has been fixed in GDB (PR/2018).
2006-10-06 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
* gdb.base/subst.exp: New testcase.

18
gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/arrayidx.exp
View File

@ -49,22 +49,10 @@ gdb_test "print one_two_three" \
"\\(1, 2, 3\\)" \
"print one_two_three, indexes off"
# There is a bug somewhere that causes the debugger to think that
# this array is indexed by an integer subrange, which it is actually
# indexed by an enumerated type. As a consequence, indexes for this
# array will be printed using their underlying integer value instead
# of their names. Also, even when printing this array without indexes,
# because the underlying value of the first enumeration is zero, the
# debugger ends up printing this index even when "array-indexes" are
# off, just because the index of the first element is not an enumerated
# type, and its value is not one.
setup_kfail "*-*-*" gdb/2018
gdb_test "print e_one_two_three" \
"\\(1, 2, 3\\)" \
"print e_one_two_three, indexes off"
# Same as when printing e_one_two_three above.
setup_kfail "*-*-*" gdb/2018
gdb_test "print r_two_three" \
"\\(two => 2, 3\\)" \
"print r_two_three, indexes off"
@ -99,16 +87,10 @@ gdb_test "print one_two_three" \
"\\(1 => 1, 2 => 2, 3 => 3\\)" \
"print one_two_three"
# Same as first attempt at printing this array, we currently fail.
# See details above.
setup_kfail "*-*-*" gdb/2018
gdb_test "print e_one_two_three" \
"\\(one => 1, two => 2, three => 3\\)" \
"print e_one_two_three"
# Same as first attempt at printing this array, we currently fail.
# See details above.
setup_kfail "*-*-*" gdb/2018
gdb_test "print r_two_three" \
"\\(two => 2, three => 3\\)" \
"print r_two_three"