yggdrasil/binutils-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2012-11-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>

Browse Source 
* MAINTAINERS: New FSF-appointed maintainers replace the Steering
	Committee.
This commit is contained in:
Pedro Alves 2012-11-07 15:39:09 +00:00
parent 34ecb04d42
commit 892a857082
2 changed files with 30 additions and 32 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2012-11-07 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* MAINTAINERS: New FSF-appointed maintainers replace the Steering
Committee.
2012-11-07 Pierre Muller <muller@sourceware.org>
* common/linux-osdata.c (dirent.h): ARI fix: Remove.

57
gdb/MAINTAINERS
View File

@ -55,13 +55,14 @@ ask questions about a patch!
There's also a couple of other people who play special roles in the GDB
community, separately from the patch process:
- The GDB Steering Committee.
- The Official FSF-appointed GDB Maintainers.
These are the official (FSF-appointed) maintainers of GDB. They have
final and overriding authority for all GDB-related decisions, including
anything described in this file. The committee is not generally
involved in day-to-day development (although its members may be, as
individuals).
These maintainers are the ones who take the overall responsibility
for GDB, as a package of the GNU project. Other GDB contributors
work under the official maintainers' supervision. They have final
and overriding authority for all GDB-related decisions, including
anything described in this file. As individuals, they may or not
be generally involved in day-to-day development.
- The Release Manager.
@ -75,7 +76,7 @@ community, separately from the patch process:
Most changes to the list of maintainers in this file are handled by
consensus among the global maintainers and any other involved parties.
In cases where consensus can not be reached, the global maintainers may
ask the Steering Committee for a final decision.
ask the official FSF-appointed GDB maintainers for a final decision.
The Obvious Fix Rule
@ -99,32 +100,24 @@ For documentation changes, about the only kind of fix that is obvious
is correction of a typo or bad English usage.
GDB Steering Committee
----------------------
The Official FSF-appointed GDB Maintainers
------------------------------------------
The members of the GDB Steering Committee are the FSF-appointed
maintainers of the GDB project.
These maintainers as a group have final authority for all GDB-related
topics; they may make whatever changes that they deem necessary, or
that the FSF requests.
The Steering Committee has final authority for all GDB-related topics;
they may make whatever changes that they deem necessary, or that the FSF
requests. However, they are generally not involved in day-to-day
development.
The current members of the steering committee are listed below, in
alphabetical order. Their affiliations are provided for reference only -
their membership on the Steering Committee is individual and not through
their affiliation, and they act on behalf of the GNU project.
Andrew Cagney (Red Hat)
Robert Dewar (AdaCore, NYU)
Klee Dienes (Apple)
Paul Hilfinger (UC Berkeley)
Dan Jacobowitz (Google)
Stan Shebs (CodeSourcery)
Richard Stallman (FSF)
Ian Lance Taylor (Google)
Todd Whitesel
The current official FSF-appointed GDB maintainers are listed below,
in alphabetical order. Their affiliations are provided for reference
only - their maintainership status is individual and not through their
affiliation, and they act on behalf of the GNU project.
Pedro Alves (Red Hat)
Joel Brobecker (AdaCore)
Doug Evans (Google)
Jan Kratochvil (Red Hat)
Tom Tromey (Red Hat)
Eli Zaretskii
Global Maintainers
------------------
@ -149,8 +142,8 @@ maintainer who originally committed it), then after 48 hours the maintainer
who called for the reversion may revert the patch.
No one may reapply a reverted patch without the agreement of the maintainer
who reverted it, or bringing the issue to the GDB Steering Committee for
discussion.
who reverted it, or bringing the issue to the official FSF-appointed
GDB maintainers for discussion.
At the moment there are no documented roadmaps for GDB development; in the
future, if there are, a reference to the list will be included here.