From 8d31d08fe61059fb94c02ae30c2b7cd0ea738df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:03:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Use xfail in ptype_tagged_param.exp Pedro pointed out that ptype_tagged_param.exp used a kfail, but an xfail would be more appropriate as the problem appears to be in gcc, not gdb. --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp index 759b10f9b6a..da9b2bb3ae6 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/ptype_tagged_param.exp @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple "ptype s" "ptype s" { } -re -wrap $nodebug { if {!$has_runtime_debug_info} { - kfail "no debug info" $gdb_test_name + xfail "no debug info" $gdb_test_name } else { fail $gdb_test_name }