PR python/29217 points out that gdb.parameter will return bool values,
but gdb.set_parameter will not properly accept them. This patch fixes
the problem by adding a special case to set_parameter.
I looked at a fix involving rewriting set_parameter in C++. However,
this one is simpler.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29217
This adds the gdb.current_language function, which can be used to find
the current language without (1) ever having the value "auto" or (2)
having to parse the output of "show language".
It also adds the gdb.Frame.language, which can be used to find the
language of a given frame. This is normally preferable if one has a
Frame object handy.
A following patch will make gdb_test error out if bogus arguments are
passed, which exposed bugs in a few testcases:
- gdb.python/py-parameter.exp, passing a spurious "1" as extra
parameter, resulting in:
ERROR: Unexpected arguments: {set test-file-param bar.txt} {The name of the file has been changed to bar.txt} {set new file parameter} 1
- gdb.python/py-xmethods.exp, a missing test message, resulting in
the next gdb_test being interpreted as message, question and
response! With the enforcing patch, this was caught with:
ERROR: Unexpected arguments: {p g.mul<char>('a')} {From Python G<>::mul.*} gdb_test {p g_ptr->mul<char>('a')} {From Python G<>::mul.*} {after: g_ptr->mul<char>('a')}
- gdb.base/pointers.exp, missing a quote.
Change-Id: I66f2db4412025a64121db7347dfb0b48240d46d4
This commit attempts to improve the help text that is generated for
gdb.Parameter objects when the user fails to provide their own
documentation.
Documentation for a gdb.Parameter is currently pulled from two
sources: the class documentation string, and the set_doc/show_doc
class attributes. Thus, a fully documented parameter might look like
this:
class Param_All (gdb.Parameter):
"""This is the class documentation string."""
show_doc = "Show the state of this parameter"
set_doc = "Set the state of this parameter"
def get_set_string (self):
val = "on"
if (self.value == False):
val = "off"
return "Test Parameter has been set to " + val
def __init__ (self, name):
super (Param_All, self).__init__ (name, gdb.COMMAND_DATA, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN)
self._value = True
Param_All ('param-all')
Then in GDB we see this:
(gdb) help set param-all
Set the state of this parameter
This is the class documentation string.
Which is fine. But, if the user skips both of the documentation parts
like this:
class Param_None (gdb.Parameter):
def get_set_string (self):
val = "on"
if (self.value == False):
val = "off"
return "Test Parameter has been set to " + val
def __init__ (self, name):
super (Param_None, self).__init__ (name, gdb.COMMAND_DATA, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN)
self._value = True
Param_None ('param-none')
Now in GDB we see this:
(gdb) help set param-none
This command is not documented.
This command is not documented.
That's not great, the duplicated text looks a bit weird. If we drop
different parts we get different results. Here's what we get if the
user drops the set_doc and show_doc attributes:
(gdb) help set param-doc
This command is not documented.
This is the class documentation string.
That kind of sucks, we say it's undocumented, then proceed to print
the documentation. Finally, if we drop the class documentation but
keep the set_doc and show_doc:
(gdb) help set param-set-show
Set the state of this parameter
This command is not documented.
That seems OK.
So, I think there's room for improvement.
With this patch, for the four cases above we now see this:
# All values provided by the user, no change in this case:
(gdb) help set param-all
Set the state of this parameter
This is the class documentation string.
# Nothing provided by the user, the first string is now different:
(gdb) help set param-none
Set the current value of 'param-none'.
This command is not documented.
# Only the class documentation is provided, the first string is
# changed as in the previous case:
(gdb) help set param-doc
Set the current value of 'param-doc'.
This is the class documentation string.
# Only the set_doc and show_doc are provided, this case is unchanged
# from before the patch:
(gdb) help set param-set-show
Set the state of this parameter
This command is not documented.
The one place where this change might be considered a negative is when
dealing with prefix commands. If we create a prefix command but don't
supply the set_doc / show_doc strings, then this is what we saw before
my patch:
(gdb) python Param_None ('print param-none')
(gdb) help set print
set print, set pr, set p
Generic command for setting how things print.
List of set print subcommands:
... snip ...
set print param-none -- This command is not documented.
... snip ...
And after my patch:
(gdb) python Param_None ('print param-none')
(gdb) help set print
set print, set pr, set p
Generic command for setting how things print.
List of set print subcommands:
... snip ...
set print param-none -- Set the current value of 'print param-none'.
... snip ...
This seems slightly less helpful than before, but I don't think its
terrible.
Additionally, I've changed what we print when the get_show_string
method is not provided in Python.
Back when gdb.Parameter was first added to GDB, we didn't provide a
show function when registering the internal command object within
GDB. As a result, GDB would make use of its "magic" mangling of the
show_doc string to create a sentence that would display the current
value (see deprecated_show_value_hack in cli/cli-setshow.c).
However, when we added support for the get_show_string method to
gdb.Parameter, there was an attempt to maintain backward compatibility
by displaying the show_doc string with the current value appended, see
get_show_value in py-param.c. Unfortunately, this isn't anywhere
close to what deprecated_show_value_hack does, and the results are
pretty poor, for example, this is GDB before my patch:
(gdb) show param-none
This command is not documented. off
I think we can all agree that this is pretty bad.
After my patch, we how show this:
(gdb) show param-none
The current value of 'param-none' is "off".
Which at least is a real sentence, even if it's not very informative.
This patch does change the way that the Python API behaves slightly,
but only in the cases when the user has missed providing GDB with some
information. In most cases I think the new behaviour is a lot better,
there's the one case (noted above) which is a bit iffy, but I think is
still OK.
I've updated the existing gdb.python/py-parameter.exp test to cover
the modified behaviour.
Finally, I've updated the documentation to (I hope) make it clearer
how the various bits of help text come together.
While looking into the language-capturing issue, I found another way
to crash gdb using parameters from Python:
(gdb) python print(gdb.parameter('endian'))
(This is related to PR python/12188, though this patch isn't going to
fix what that bug is really about.)
The problem here is that the global variable that underlies the
"endian" parameter is initialized to NULL. However, that's not a
valid value for an "enum" set/show parameter.
My understanding is that, in gdb, an "enum" parameter's underlying
variable must have a value that is "==" (not just strcmp-equal) to one
of the values coming from the enum array. This invariant is relied on
in various places.
I started this patch by fixing the problem with "endian". Then I
added some assertions to add_setshow_enum_cmd to try to catch other
problems of the same type.
This patch fixes all the problems that I found. I also looked at all
the calls to add_setshow_enum_cmd to ensure that they were all
included in the gdb I tested. I think they are: there are no calls in
nat-* files, or in remote-sim.c; and I was trying a build with all
targets, Python, and Guile enabled.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12188
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
Split the file into multiple independent test procs, where each proc
starts with a fresh GDB. I find it easier to understand what a test is
doing when each part of the test is isolated and self-contained. It
makes it easier to comment out some parts of the test while working /
debugging a specific part. It also makes it easier to add new things
(which a subsequent patch will do) without fear of impacting another part
of the test.
Change-Id: I8b4d52ac82b1492d79b679e13914ed177d8a836d
Give a test a proper name in order to avoid including a path in the
test name.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Give a test a proper name to avoid
including a path in the test name.
It was reported on IRC that using gdb.parameter('data-directory')
doesn't work correctly.
The problem is that the data directory is stored in 'gdb_datadir',
however the set/show command is associated with a temporary
'staged_gdb_datadir'.
When the user does 'set data-directory VALUE', the VALUE is stored in
'staged_gdb_datadir' by GDB, then set_gdb_datadir is called. This in
turn calls set_gdb_data_directory to copy the value from
staged_gdb_datadir into gdb_datadir.
However, set_gdb_data_directory will resolve relative paths, so the
value stored in gdb_datadir might not match the value in
staged_gdb_datadir.
The Python gdb.parameter API fetches the parameter values by accessing
the variable associated with the show command, so in this case
staged_gdb_datadir. This causes two problems:
1. Initially staged_gdb_datadir is NULL, and remains as such until the
user does 'set data-directory VALUE' (which might never happen), but
gdb_datadir starts with GDB's default data-directory value. So
initially from Python gdb.parameter('data-directory') will return the
empty string, even though at GDB's CLI 'show data-directory' prints a
real path.
2. If the user does 'set data-directory ./some/relative/path', GDB
will resolve the relative path, thus, 'show data-directory' at the CLI
will print an absolute path. However, the value is staged_gdb_datadir
will still be the relative path, and gdb.parameter('data-directory')
from Python will return the relative path.
In this commit I fix both of these issues by:
1. Initialising the value in staged_gdb_datadir based on the initial
value in gdb_datadir, and
2. In set_gdb_datadir, after calling set_gdb_data_directory, I copy
the value in gdb_datadir back into staged_gdb_datadir.
With these two changes in place the value in staged_gdb_datadir should
always match the value in gdb_datadir, and accessing data-directory
from Python should now work correctly.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* top.c (staged_gdb_datadir): Update comment.
(set_gdb_datadir): Copy the value of gdb_datadir back into
staged_datadir.
(init_main): Initialise staged_gdb_datadir.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Add test for reading data-directory
using gdb.parameter API.
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
Tom de Vries detected that some python tests were broken as
they were still using gdb_py_test_multiple that was replaced
by gdb_test_multiline. Repair these tests by using the new function.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2020-06-30 Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
* gdb.python/py-breakpoint.exp: use gdb_test_multiline instead
of gdb_py_test_multiple.
* gdb.python/py-cmd.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-events.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-function.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-inferior.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-infthread.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-linetable.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-value.exp: Likewise.
This commit removes some, but not all, of the test name duplication
within the gdb.python tests. On my local machine this takes the
number of duplicate test names in this set of tests from 174 to 85.
It is possible that different setups might encounter more duplicate
tests.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Make test names unique.
* gdb.python/py-template.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.python/py-value.exp: Likewise.
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
A convention in the Python layer is that raising a gdb.GdbError will
not print the Python stack -- instead the exception is treated as any
other gdb exception.
PR python/18852 asks that this treatment be extended the the
get_set_value method of gdb.Parameter. This makes sense, because it
lets Python-created parameters act like gdb parameters.
2018-09-23 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/18852:
* python/py-param.c (get_set_value): Use gdbpy_handle_exception.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-23 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/18852:
* python.texi (Parameters In Python): Document exception behavior
of get_set_string.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2018-09-23 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/18852:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Add test for parameter that throws
on "set".
It's long bothered me that setting a Python parameter from the CLI
will print the "set" help text by default. I think usually "set"
commands should be silent. And, while you can modify this behavior a
bit by providing a "get_set_string" method, if this method returns an
empty string, a blank line will be printed.
This patch removes the "help" behavior and changes the get_set_string
behavior to avoid printing a blank line. The code has a comment about
preserving API behavior, but I don't think this is truly important;
and in any case the workaround -- implementing get_set_string -- is
trivial.
Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 26.
2018-04-26 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* NEWS: Mention new "set" behavior.
* python/py-param.c (get_set_value): Don't print an empty string.
Don't call get_doc_string.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-04-26 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python.texi (Parameters In Python): Update get_set_string
documentation.
Pedro pointed out that a test in py-parameter.exp had an empty
message. This fixes it.
testsuite/ChangeLog
2018-05-02 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Set test message.
PR python/20084 points out that the Python API doesn't handle the
var_zuinteger and var_zuinteger_unlimited parameter types.
This patch adds support for these types.
Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 26.
ChangeLog
2018-05-02 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/20084:
* python/python.c (gdbpy_parameter_value): Handle var_zuinteger
and var_zuinteger_unlimited.
* python/py-param.c (struct parm_constant): Add PARAM_ZUINTEGER
and PARAM_ZUINTEGER_UNLIMITED.
(set_parameter_value): Handle var_zuinteger and
var_zuinteger_unlimited.
(add_setshow_generic): Likewise.
(parmpy_init): Likewise.
doc/ChangeLog
2018-05-02 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/20084:
* python.texi (Parameters In Python): Document PARAM_ZUINTEGER and
PARAM_ZUINTEGER_UNLIMITED.
testsuite/ChangeLog
2018-05-02 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/20084:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Add PARAM_ZUINTEGER and
PARAM_ZUINTEGER_UNLIMITED tests.
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp:
* gdb.guile/scm-parameter.exp: Escape the path that we are
matching against, as it might contain characters that are special
to regular expressions.
Test gdb.python/py-parameter.exp expects output "$srcdir/$subdir:\$cdir:\$cwd",
but proc gdb_reinitialize_dir doesn't set $srcdir/$subdir in search
directories on remote host because it doesn't exist on remote host.
proc gdb_reinitialize_dir { subdir } {
global gdb_prompt
if [is_remote host] {
return ""
}
It causes the fail below:
(gdb) python print (gdb.parameter ('directories'))^M
/tmp/gdb:$cdir:$cwd^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: python print (gdb.parameter ('directories'))
This patch is to fix this fail by not matching $srcdir/$subdir on remote host.
gdb/testsuite:
2014-10-15 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Don't match $srcdir/$subdir on
remote host.
Two modifications:
1. The addition of 2013 to the copyright year range for every file;
2. The use of a single year range, instead of potentially multiple
year ranges, as approved by the FSF.
* gdb.base/charset.exp: Change print syntax for Python 3
compatibility.
* gdb.python/py-block.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-breakpoint.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-cmd.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-events.py: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.py: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint2.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint2.py: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-frame-inline.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-frame.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-infthread.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-progspace.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-prompt.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-symbol.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-symtab.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-template.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/python.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/source2.py: Ditto.
* gdb.python/lib-types.exp: Change print syntax for Python 3
compatibility.
Use sorted() function rather than sort() method.
Accept either int or long values for enum values.
* gdb.python/py-events.exp: Use exec(open(...).read()) instead of
execfile for Python 3 compatibility.
* gdb.python/py-evsignal.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-evthreads.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-mi.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-pp-maint.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.exp: Ditto.
* gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp: Change print syntax for
Python 3 compatibility.
Skip tests for Python 2.4.
* gdb.python/py-inferior.exp: Change print syntax for
Python 3 compatibility.
Use byte string rather than character string in memory write test
if Python 3.
* gdb.python/py-pp-maint.py: Change class declarations to "new
class" syntax.
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.py: Change iterator class to generator
function for Python 3 compatibility.
Make all classes "new style".
Fix indentation issue and stray semicolon.
* gdb.python/py-shared.expChange print syntax for Python 3
compatibility.
Define "long" if Python 3.
* gdb.python/py-type.exp: Change print syntax for Python 3
compatibility.
Accept either int or long values for enum values.
* gdb.python/py-value.exp: Change print syntax for Python 3
compatibility.
Skip "long" and "unicode" tests if Python 3.
Accept either "type" or "class" in type checks.
* lib/gdb.exp (gdb_py_is_py3k): New flag set if Python 3.
(gdb_py_is_py24): New flag set if Python 2.4 or 2.5.
New command "set directories".
* NEWS: Document them.
* source.c (set_directories_command): New function.
(show_directories_1): Renamed from show_directories.
All callers updated.
(show_directories_command): New function.
(_initialize_source): Install "directories" as a set/show
variable instead of just a show command.
doc/
* gdb.texinfo (Source Path): Document "set directories".
testsuite/
* gdb.base/help.exp: Update expected output.
* gdb.python/py-parameter.exp: New file.