Currently, with "set breakpoint auto-hw off", we'll still try to insert a software breakpoint at addresses covered by supposedly read-only or inacessible regions: (top-gdb) mem 0x443000 0x450000 ro (top-gdb) set mem inaccessible-by-default off (top-gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000443956 <+34>: movq $0x0,0x10(%rax) => 0x000000000044395e <+42>: movq $0x0,0x18(%rax) 0x0000000000443966 <+50>: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax 0x0000000000443969 <+53>: mov %eax,-0x20(%rbp) End of assembler dump. (top-gdb) b *0x0000000000443969 Breakpoint 5 at 0x443969: file ../../src/gdb/gdb.c, line 29. (top-gdb) c Continuing. warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0x443969 Breakpoint 5, 0x0000000000443969 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd918) at ../../src/gdb/gdb.c:29 29 args.argc = argc; (top-gdb) We warn, saying that the insertion can't be done, but then proceed attempting the insertion anyway, and in case of manually added regions, the insert actually succeeds. This is a regression; GDB used to fail inserting the breakpoint. More below. I stumbled on this as I wrote a test that manually sets up a read-only memory region with the "mem" command, in order to test GDB's behavior with breakpoints set on read-only regions, even when the real memory the breakpoints are set at isn't really read-only. I wanted that in order to add a test that exercises software single-stepping through read-only regions. Note that the memory regions that target_memory_map returns aren't like e.g., what would expect to see in /proc/PID/maps on Linux. Instead, they're the physical memory map from the _debuggers_ perspective. E.g., a read-only region would be real ROM or flash memory, while a read-only+execute mapping in /proc/PID/maps is still read-write to the debugger (otherwise the debugger wouldn't be able to set software breakpoints in the code segment). If one tries to manually write to memory that falls within a memory region that is known to be read-only, with e.g., "p foo = 1", then we hit a check in memory_xfer_partial_1 before the write mananges to make it to the target side. But writing a software/memory breakpoint nowadays goes through target_write_raw_memory, and unlike when writing memory with TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, nothing on the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY path checks whether we're trying to write to a read-only region. At the time "breakpoint auto-hw" was added, we didn't have the TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY vs TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY target object distinction yet, and the code path in memory_xfer_partial that blocks writes to read-only memory was hit for memory breakpoints too. With GDB 6.8 we had: warning: cannot set software breakpoint at readonly address 0000000000443943 Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Error accessing memory address 0x443943: Input/output error. So I started out by fixing this by adding the memory region validation to TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY too. But later, when testing against GDBserver, I realized that that would only block software/memory breakpoints GDB itself inserts with gdb/mem-break.c. If a target has a to_insert_breakpoint method, the insertion request will still pass through to the target. So I ended up converting the "cannot set breakpoint" warning in breakpoint.c to a real error return, thus blocking the insertion sooner. With that, we'll end up no longer needing the TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY changes once software single-step breakpoints are converted to real breakpoints. We need them today as software single-step breakpoints bypass insert_bp_location. But, it'll be best to leave that in as safeguard anyway, for other direct uses of TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver. gdb/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): Error out if inserting a software breakpoint at a read-only address. * target.c (memory_xfer_check_region): New function, factored out from ... (memory_xfer_partial_1): ... this. Make the 'reg_len' local a ULONGEST. (target_xfer_partial) <TARGET_OBJECT_RAW_MEMORY>: Check the access against the memory region attributes. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-01 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.c: New file. * gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp: New file.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
README for GNU development tools This directory contains various GNU compilers, assemblers, linkers, debuggers, etc., plus their support routines, definitions, and documentation. If you are receiving this as part of a GDB release, see the file gdb/README. If with a binutils release, see binutils/README; if with a libg++ release, see libg++/README, etc. That'll give you info about this package -- supported targets, how to use it, how to report bugs, etc. It is now possible to automatically configure and build a variety of tools with one command. To build all of the tools contained herein, run the ``configure'' script here, e.g.: ./configure make To install them (by default in /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/lib, etc), then do: make install (If the configure script can't determine your type of computer, give it the name as an argument, for instance ``./configure sun4''. You can use the script ``config.sub'' to test whether a name is recognized; if it is, config.sub translates it to a triplet specifying CPU, vendor, and OS.) If you have more than one compiler on your system, it is often best to explicitly set CC in the environment before running configure, and to also set CC when running make. For example (assuming sh/bash/ksh): CC=gcc ./configure make A similar example using csh: setenv CC gcc ./configure make Much of the code and documentation enclosed is copyright by the Free Software Foundation, Inc. See the file COPYING or COPYING.LIB in the various directories, for a description of the GNU General Public License terms under which you can copy the files. REPORTING BUGS: Again, see gdb/README, binutils/README, etc., for info on where and how to report problems.
Description