Emilio Cobos Álvarez
b2e224354b
Using operator= is not quite sound in presence of destructors and operator overloading. It's perfectly fine to assume that the left-hand-side of an operator= expression is valid memory, however we're using uninitialized memory here, that may not be the case. Use placement new to properly construct tagged unions. I don't need this with any urgency, but it's the right thing to do in presence of complex types, and the current code seems a bomb waiting to explode :)
37 lines
399 B
C++
37 lines
399 B
C++
#include <cstdarg>
|
|
#include <cstdint>
|
|
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
#include <new>
|
|
|
|
#if defined(BAR)
|
|
static const int32_t BAR = 2;
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#if defined(FOO)
|
|
static const int32_t FOO = 1;
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#if defined(BAR)
|
|
struct Bar {
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#if defined(FOO)
|
|
struct Foo {
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
extern "C" {
|
|
|
|
#if defined(BAR)
|
|
void bar(const Bar *bar);
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#if defined(FOO)
|
|
void foo(const Foo *foo);
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
} // extern "C"
|