b2e224354b
Using operator= is not quite sound in presence of destructors and operator overloading. It's perfectly fine to assume that the left-hand-side of an operator= expression is valid memory, however we're using uninitialized memory here, that may not be the case. Use placement new to properly construct tagged unions. I don't need this with any urgency, but it's the right thing to do in presence of complex types, and the current code seems a bomb waiting to explode :)
19 lines
346 B
C++
19 lines
346 B
C++
#include <cstdarg>
|
|
#include <cstdint>
|
|
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
#include <new>
|
|
|
|
struct Fns {
|
|
void (*noArgs)();
|
|
void (*anonymousArg)(int32_t);
|
|
int32_t (*returnsNumber)();
|
|
int8_t (*namedArgs)(int32_t first, int16_t snd);
|
|
int8_t (*namedArgsWildcards)(int32_t _, int16_t named, int64_t _1);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
extern "C" {
|
|
|
|
void root(Fns _fns);
|
|
|
|
} // extern "C"
|