Extend splitter pattern to reversed condition by swapping then and else rtx. [PR target/104982]
Failed to match this instruction: (set (reg/v:SI 88 [ z ]) (if_then_else:SI (eq (zero_extract:SI (reg:SI 92) (const_int 1 [0x1]) (zero_extend:SI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 93) 0))) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:SI 95) (reg:SI 94))) but it's equal to (set (reg/v:SI 88 [ z ]) (if_then_else:SI (ne (zero_extract:SI (reg:SI 92) (const_int 1 [0x1]) (zero_extend:SI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 93) 0))) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:SI 94) (reg:SI 95))) which is the exact existing splitter. The patch will fix below regressions: On x86-64, r12-7687 caused: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/bt-5.c scan-assembler-not sar[lq][ \t] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/bt-5.c scan-assembler-times bt[lq][ \t] 7 gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/104982 * config/i386/i386.md (*jcc_bt<mode>_mask): Extend the following splitter to reversed condition.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d5ee28951
commit
919fbffef0
@ -14182,12 +14182,12 @@
|
||||
(define_split
|
||||
[(set (match_operand:SWI248 0 "register_operand")
|
||||
(if_then_else:SWI248
|
||||
(ne
|
||||
(zero_extract:SWI48
|
||||
(match_operator 5 "bt_comparison_operator"
|
||||
[(zero_extract:SWI48
|
||||
(match_operand:SWI48 1 "register_operand")
|
||||
(const_int 1)
|
||||
(zero_extend:SI (match_operand:QI 2 "register_operand")))
|
||||
(const_int 0))
|
||||
(const_int 0)])
|
||||
(match_operand:SWI248 3 "nonimmediate_operand")
|
||||
(match_operand:SWI248 4 "nonimmediate_operand")))]
|
||||
"TARGET_USE_BT && TARGET_CMOVE
|
||||
@ -14202,6 +14202,8 @@
|
||||
(match_dup 3)
|
||||
(match_dup 4)))]
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (GET_CODE (operands[5]) == EQ)
|
||||
std::swap (operands[3], operands[4]);
|
||||
operands[2] = lowpart_subreg (SImode, operands[2], QImode);
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user