[libc++][bit] Improves rotate functions. (#98032)
Investigating #96612 shows our implementation was different from the Standard and could cause UB. Testing the codegen showed quite a bit of assembly generated for these functions. The functions have been written differently which allows Clang to optimize the code to use simple CPU rotate instructions. Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/96612
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2f25af711
commit
01a49d21c7
@ -20,24 +20,37 @@
|
||||
|
||||
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
|
||||
|
||||
// Writing two full functions for rotl and rotr makes it easier for the compiler
|
||||
// to optimize the code. On x86 this function becomes the ROL instruction and
|
||||
// the rotr function becomes the ROR instruction.
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotr(_Tp __t, int __cnt) _NOEXCEPT {
|
||||
static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotr requires an unsigned integer type");
|
||||
const unsigned int __dig = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
|
||||
if ((__cnt % __dig) == 0)
|
||||
return __t;
|
||||
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotl(_Tp __x, int __s) _NOEXCEPT {
|
||||
static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotl requires an unsigned integer type");
|
||||
const int __N = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
|
||||
int __r = __s % __N;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__cnt < 0) {
|
||||
__cnt *= -1;
|
||||
return (__t << (__cnt % __dig)) | (__t >> (__dig - (__cnt % __dig))); // rotr with negative __cnt is similar to rotl
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (__r == 0)
|
||||
return __x;
|
||||
|
||||
return (__t >> (__cnt % __dig)) | (__t << (__dig - (__cnt % __dig)));
|
||||
if (__r > 0)
|
||||
return (__x << __r) | (__x >> (__N - __r));
|
||||
|
||||
return (__x >> -__r) | (__x << (__N + __r));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
template <class _Tp>
|
||||
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotl(_Tp __t, int __cnt) _NOEXCEPT {
|
||||
return std::__rotr(__t, -__cnt);
|
||||
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotr(_Tp __x, int __s) _NOEXCEPT {
|
||||
static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotr requires an unsigned integer type");
|
||||
const int __N = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
|
||||
int __r = __s % __N;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__r == 0)
|
||||
return __x;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__r > 0)
|
||||
return (__x >> __r) | (__x << (__N - __r));
|
||||
|
||||
return (__x << -__r) | (__x >> (__N + __r));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 20
|
||||
|
@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 5) == T(max - 32));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 6) == T(max - 64));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 7) == T(max - 128));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max()) ==
|
||||
std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
|
||||
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -1) == T(max - highbit));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -2) == T(max - (highbit >> 1)));
|
||||
@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -5) == T(max - (highbit >> 4)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -6) == T(max - (highbit >> 5)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -7) == T(max - (highbit >> 6)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min()) ==
|
||||
std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
|
||||
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(1), 0) == T(1));
|
||||
assert(std::rotl(T(1), 1) == T(2));
|
||||
|
@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 5) == T(max - (highbit >> 4)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 6) == T(max - (highbit >> 5)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 7) == T(max - (highbit >> 6)));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max()) ==
|
||||
std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
|
||||
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -1) == T(max - 2));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -2) == T(max - 4));
|
||||
@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -5) == T(max - 32));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -6) == T(max - 64));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -7) == T(max - 128));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min()) ==
|
||||
std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
|
||||
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(128), 0) == T(128));
|
||||
assert(std::rotr(T(128), 1) == T(64));
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user