fixes#92676
So right now clang does not like
```
std::expected<std::any, int> e1;
auto e2 = e1;
```
So basically when clang tries to do overload resolution of `auto e2 =
e1;`
It finds
```
expected(const expected&); // 1. This is OK
expected(const expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&) requires __can_convert; // 2. This needs to check its constraints
```
Then in `__can_convert`, one of the check is
```
_Not<is_constructible<_Tp, expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&>>
```
which is checking
```
is_constructible<std::any, expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&>
```
Then it looks at `std::any`'s constructor
```
template < class _ValueType,
class _Tp = decay_t<_ValueType>,
class = enable_if_t< !is_same<_Tp, any>::value && !__is_inplace_type<_ValueType>::value &&
is_copy_constructible<_Tp>::value> >
any(_ValueType&& __value);
```
In the above, `is_copy_constructible<_Tp>` expands to
```
is_copy_constructible<std::expected<std::any, int>>
```
And the above goes back to the original thing we asked : copy the
`std::expected`, which goes to the overload resolution again.
```
expected(const expected&);
expected(const expected<_Up, _OtherErr>&) requires __can_convert;
```
So the second overload results in a logical cycle.
I am not a language lawyer. We could argue that clang should give up on
the second overload which has logical cycle, as the first overload is a
perfect match.
Anyway, the fix in this patch tries to short-circuiting the second
overload's constraint check: that is, if the argument matches exact same
`expected<T, E>`, we give up immediately and let the copy constructor to
deal with it
16f349251f