Remove "RSA" section from README.md.
Despite the fact that "the primary *ring* developer is less interested in RSA than ECC and other things," he (and others) ended up doing a lot of work on RSA so this was misleading. Also remove the "oxidation" section until we can provide people with better guidance.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a5d3a4300
commit
201fb47fcc
@ -100,14 +100,6 @@ contribute already, see these curated lists of open issues:
|
||||
Bugs that we think newcomers might find best to start with. Note that what
|
||||
makes a bug a good fit depends a lot on the developer's background and not
|
||||
just the hardness of the work.
|
||||
* [oxidation](https://github.com/briansmith/ring/projects/1): Replacing
|
||||
C code with Rust code.
|
||||
* [rsa](https://github.com/briansmith/ring/labels/rsa): The primary *ring*
|
||||
developer is less interested in RSA than ECC and other things, and it would
|
||||
be great to have somebody jump in and "own" the RSA work. *ring* has
|
||||
inherited the fastest open source RSA implementation (as far as we know)
|
||||
from BoringSSL/OpenSSL, and we've already done a lot of cleanup. But, there's
|
||||
a lot more work to do.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition, we're always interested in these kinds of contributions:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user