David Benjamin fc6e5a7372 Drop the silly 'ECDH_' prefix on X25519.
I got that from the TLS 1.3 draft, but it's kind of silly-looking. X25519
already refers to a Diffie-Hellman primitive.

Also hopefully the WG will split NamedGroups and SignatureAlgorithms per the
recent proposal, so it won't be needed anyway. (Most chatter is about what
hashes should be allowed with what NIST curves, so it seems like people like
the split itself? We'll see.)

Change-Id: I7bb713190001199a3ebd30b67df2c00d29132431
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6912
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-01-20 17:26:13 +00:00
..
2015-12-22 23:28:22 +00:00
2015-12-22 23:28:22 +00:00
2016-01-15 22:14:39 +00:00
2015-11-20 23:34:12 +00:00
2015-10-20 19:03:24 +00:00