Since newlib allows people to opt-in to extra errno names, pull them
into our table too. The values don't conflict with each other -- the
newlib names & values are distinct from newlib's Linux compatibility.
1.The linker for each DESC generates a R_LARCH_TLS_DESC64 dynamic
relocation, which relocation is placed at .rela.dyn.
TLSDESC always allocates two GOT slots and one dynamic relocation
space to TLSDESC.
2. When using multiple ways to access the same TLS variable, a
maximum of 5 GOT slots are used. For example, using GD, TLSDESC,
and IE to access the same TLS variable, GD always uses the first
two of the five GOT, TLSDESC uses the third and fourth, and IE
uses the last.
This fixes the buffer overflow added in commit 22b78fad28, and a few
other problems.
* loongarch-coder.c (loongarch_split_args_by_comma): Don't
overflow buffer when args == "". Don't remove unbalanced
quotes. Don't trim last arg if max number of args exceeded.
Some spots loop on the frame chain to find the first next non-inline
frame, and pass that as the "next frame" to
value::allocate_register_lazy / value::allocate_register. This is
necessary if the value is used in the process of computing the id of
"this frame". If the frame next to "this frame" is inlined into "this
frame", then you that next frame won't have a computed id yet. You have
to go past that to find the next non-inline frame, which will have a
computed id.
In other cases, it's fine to store the id of an inline frame as the
"next frame id" in a register struct value. When trying to unwind a
register from it, it will just call inline_frame_prev_register, which
will forward the request to the next next frame, until we hit the next
physical frame.
I think it would make things simpler to just never store the id of an
inline frame as the next frame id of register struct values, and go with
the first next non-inline frame directly. This way, we don't have to
wonder which code paths have to skip inline frames when creating
register values and which don't.
So, change value::allocate_register_lazy to do that work, and remove the
loops for the callers that did it.
Change-Id: Ic88115dac49dc14e3053c95f92050062b24b7310
Remove VALUE_REGNUM, replace it with a method on struct value. Set
`m_location.reg.regnum` directly from value::allocate_register_lazy,
which is fine because allocate_register_lazy is a static creation
function for struct value.
Change-Id: Id632502357da971617d9dce1e2eab9b56dbcf52d
Remove VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID, replace it with a method on struct value. Set
`m_location.reg.next_frame_id` directly from value::allocate_register_lazy,
which is fine because allocate_register_lazy is a static creation
function for struct value.
Change-Id: Ic9f0f239c166a88dccfee836f9f51871e67548e6
As explained in the comment removed by the previous commit "gdb: pass
non-nullptr frame to gdbarch_value_from_register in
address_from_register", address_from_register copies some implementation
bits from value_from_register:
/* This routine may be called during early unwinding, at a time
where the ID of FRAME is not yet known. Calling value_from_register
would therefore abort in get_frame_id. However, since we only need
a temporary value that is never used as lvalue, we actually do not
really need to set its VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID. Therefore, we re-implement
the core of value_from_register, but use the null_frame_id. */
This is no longer relevant, since we now create a value with a valid next
frame id, so change address_from_register to use value_from_register.
Change-Id: I189bd96f28735ed9f47750ffd73764c459ec6f43
By now, all register struct values should have a valid next frame id
(assuming they are created using value::allocate_register or
value::allocate_register_lazy), so there should be no need to pass a
frame alongside the value to read_frame_register_value. Remove the
frame parameter and adjust read_frame_register_value accordingly.
While at it, make read_frame_register_value static, it's only used in
findvar.c.
Change-Id: I118959ef8c628499297c67810916e8ba9934bfac
Some places that create register struct values don't use register_type
to obtain the value type. This prevents them from using the current
version of value::allocate_register. One spot (value_of_register_lazy)
also creates a lazy register value.
Add a value::allocate_register_lazy method. Add some type parameters
to value::allocate_register and value::allocate_register_lazy, to let
the caller specify the type to use for the value. The parameters
default to nullptr, in which case we use register_type to obtain the
type.
Change-Id: I640ec0a5a0f4a55eba12d515dbfd25933229f8ec
address_from_register used to pass null_frame_id to
gdbarch_value_from_register as "this frame"'s id, because it's possible
for it to be called during unwind, when "this frame"'s id is not yet
known. This create an oddity where those register struct values are
created without a valid next frame id. I would much prefer for things
to be consistent and have all register struct values to have a valid
next frame id.
Since gdbarch_value_from_register takes a frame_info_ptr now, rather
than a frame_id, we can pass down "this frame", even if it doesn't have
a valid id. gdbarch_value_from_register implementations can obtain the
next frame from it.
However, it's possible for the "this frame"'s next frame to be an
inline frame, inlined in "this frame", in which case that next frame's
id is also not known. So, loop until we get to the next non-inline
frame (which is actually the frame where registers for "this frame" are
unwound from). This is the same thing that we do in
value_of_register_lazy, for the same reason. A later patch will factor
out this "while next frame is inline" loop to apply it to all register
struct values, so this is somewhat temporary.
Change-Id: If487c82620cc5a4a4ea5807f0a0bad80ab984078
Pass a frame_info_ptr rather than a frame_id. This avoids having to do
a frame lookup on the callee side, when we can just pass the frame down
directly.
I think this fixes a bug in rs6000-tdep.c where the id of the wrong
frame was set to `VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID (v)`.
Change-Id: I77039bc87ea8fc5262f16d0e1446515efa21c565
I don't think that setting the next frame id is needed there, all code
paths in cooked_read_value do set it properly, AFAIK.
Change-Id: Idb9d9e6f89c2c95c5ebfeec2a63fde89ed84cf3d
Since this function never returns, mark it as such to fix some unused
variable warnings in error code paths.
For example, cris triggers:
sim/cris/semcrisv10f-switch.c:3558:11: error:
variable 'tmp_newval' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
Even though it has an "else" path that calls this error function.
Since these insns don't do anything and are effectively ignored,
return early to avoid doing any common processing at the end as
that requires initializing variables like "res" with something.
The plds Dz,MACL insn stores the Dz bit into MACL. The current code
was storing the "res" variable into Dz and then into MACL, but not
setting "res" to anything. Delete that logic and make it match the
existing plds Dz,MACH insn.
These decoders declare a lot of common variables for use by substeps,
and then shadows a few because of how the opc generator is implemented.
Easiest way around it is to rename the per-substep vars as needed as
anything more would require substantial changes to the opc logic.
The mloop files include CGEN generated switch files which have some
nested assignments that expand into repeated shadowed variables.
Fixing this looks fairly non-trivial as it appears to be interplay
between the common CGEN code and how this particular set of cris
insns are defined. Disable the warning instead.
In file included from sim/cris/mloop.in:286:
sim/cris/semcrisv10f-switch.c: In function ‘crisv10f_engine_run_full’:
sim/cris/semcrisv10f-switch.c:12383:8: error: declaration of ‘opval’ shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow=local]
12383 | SI opval = tmp_addr;
| ^~~~~
sim/cris/semcrisv10f-switch.c:12371:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
12371 | USI opval = ({ SI tmp_addr;
| ^~~~~
And the code looks like:
USI opval = ({
...
{
SI opval = tmp_addr;
...
}
...
});
Since the CGEN code treats "opval" as an internal variable that the cpu
definitions don't have direct access to, the likelihood of this being a
real bug is low, so leave it be. The warning is suppressed for more code
that is hand written (e.g. the mloop logic), but disabling for the entire
file is the easiest way to suppress while keeping it on everywhere else in
the sim.
Remove duplicate nested variable declarations, rename some to avoid
confusion when the type is different or the original value should be
retained, and fix some weirdness with nested enums in structs.
These functions have local vars named "val" of type float, and
then create nested vars named "val" of type double. This is a
bit confusing and causes build time warnings.
This changes the test suite to look for rogue DAP exceptions in the
log file, and issue a "fail" if one is found.
Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
I noticed that the DAP attach test case (and similarly
remoted-dap.exp) had a rogue exception stack trace in the log. It
turns out that an attach will generate a stop that does not have a
reason.
This patch fixes the problem in the _on_stop event listener by making
it a bit more careful when examining the event reason. It also adds
some machinery so that attach stops can be suppressed, which I think
is the right thing to do.
Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
This adds a new parameter to control the DAP logging level. By
default, "expected" exceptions are not logged, but the parameter lets
the user change this when more logging is desired.
This also changes a couple of spots to avoid logging the stack trace
for a DAPException.
This patch also documents the existing DAP logging parameter. I
forgot to document this before.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
This introduces a new DAPException class, and then changes various
spots in the DAP implementation to wrap "expected" exceptions in this.
This class will help detect rogue exceptions caused by bugs in the
implementation.
Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
clang 16 reports a missing declaration in new-op.cc. We believed
these operators to be declared starting with C++14, but apparently
that is not the case.
This patch reverts the earlier change and then updates the comment to
reflect the current state.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31141
